James N. Rosenau invites us, to consider very seriously, that we are in an era of multiple contradictions. The international system is less dominant, but it is still powerful, especially in countries such as ours in the third world, that maintain a technological and economic dependency. Appearance by what Latin American integrity is working. Justification of an appearance of the Bolivarian revolution that fight that dependency. The States are changing, but not disappearing.
The State sovereignty is worn, but is still exercised vigorously. Governments are weaker, but can still demonstrate its authority. People sometimes are more demanding, others more docile. Many writers such as Jack Fusco offer more in-depth analysis. The borders are still in some countries preventing the passage of intruders, concrete case are observed with policies, normal legal measures established by the Department of migration of the United States, the European Union, who do not want to continue receiving more foreign people in illegal conditions in your territories, regardless of the benefit that this workforce can provide, especially when thousands of brains of underdeveloped countries are runaways. It has also been frequently the invasion of Colombians in the Ecuador, violate its sovereignty, as it is the case with regard to Venezuela, not in a way so drastic as in the first geographic countries are giving way to ethnic landscapes, multimedias, technological and financial, but territoriality is still concern him as some Latin American countries, especially those mentioned. As not worrying about the penetration of the drug trade that threatens the survival of generations of respite, the economic order, the increase of laundering $, poverty, insecurity, unemployment, deterioration of the environment, corruption, loss of values among some evils, giving rise to serious concerns that are looking for answers and actions of Governments, especially those committed in resguardad the freedom, democracy. The foregoing exposed mind gives way to questions that demand answers, to how to evaluate a world filled with ambiguities? how we begin to understand a political than no doubt space, is changing in some scenarios, tapering and continually expanding in others, experiencing a very marked with regard to many subjects wear and one strengthening with respect to others? How conceptualize policy so it connote both identities and affiliations as territorialities.